Thursday, December 13, 2007

A List of House Seats To Target

SPECIAL-INTEREST SPENDING

The 20 freshman members of Congress who had the most special-interest spending, or "earmarks," in the House and Senate spending bills. This includes only spending items with a single sponsor, not multiple sponsors.

Member, party, state, (district)

Total earmarks


Rep. Christopher Carney, D-Pa. (10th)

$18,185,000


Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa.

$16,649,579


Rep. Jason Altmire, D-Pa. (4th)

$12,475,000


Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa. (8th)

$11,822,500


Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa. (7th)

$11,175,000


Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va.

$11,000,000


Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa (1st)

$10,586,540


Rep. Steve Kagen, D-Wis. (8th)

$10,485,000


Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky. (3rd)

$10,456,000


Rep. Nick Lampson, D-Texas (22nd)

$10,423,537


Rep. Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind. (8th)

$10,356,000


Rep. Heath Shuler, D-N.C. (11th)

$10,333,000


Rep. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. (5th)

$10,325,000


Rep. Baron Hill, D-Ind. (9th)

$9,760,000


Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind. (2nd)

$9,640,000


Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Calif. (11th)

$9,275,000


Rep. Paul Hodes, D-N.H. (2nd)

$8,806,000


Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt. (at-large)

$8,781,000


Rep. Charlie Wilson, D-Ohio (6th)

$8,726,000


Rep. Michael Arcuri, D-N.Y. (24th)

$8,425,000

Source: USA TODAY analysis based on data from Taxpayers for Common Sense



Nine of these twenty are member of the Blue Dog Coalition bloc of the democratic Party. They claim to be the true fiscal conservatives in the Congress who never vote to spend taxpayer dollars that aren't paid for and essential for the country.

Seventeen of the eighteen defeated an incumbent Republican or seat that was last held by a Republican. They won by demonizing the Republicans for getting pork through the House for their lobbyist pals. Now they are doing the very same thing they accused their opponent of doing.

The only two that can't be targeted in '08 from this list are Senator Webb and Senator Casey. We will have to wait until 2012 to kick them out.

Michael Barone wrote an interesting article about off year elections for the House.
A snippet
The minority party often does well in special elections; a voter knows that his vote will not determine which party controls the House. The fact that Democrat Nikki Tsongas won by only 51 to 45 percent in the very seriously contested race in October in Massachusetts 5 (a 57-to-41 John Kerry district in 2004) was bad news for Democrats. This week's results were not bad news for Republicans. Yes, Latta ran 4 points behind Bush's 2004 percentage, but that's not as much as the 6 points Tsongas ran behind Kerry's 2004 percentage. To me this suggests that the low job approval rating for Congress poses more problems for Democrats than for Republicans in 2008.


Michael Barone is a living breathing almanac of American politics. I respect his analysis more than any other pol, pundit or pollster bar none.

No comments: